Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
theocs:lecture5-6 [2024/10/17 13:20] – [Pumping lemma] tami | theocs:lecture5-6 [2024/10/17 13:33] (current) – [Pumping lemma] tami | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
If we put $n$ into $m$ pigeonholes ($n>m$), then at least one pigeon hole must have more than one pigeon! | If we put $n$ into $m$ pigeonholes ($n>m$), then at least one pigeon hole must have more than one pigeon! | ||
</ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP center round info 60%> | ||
+ | **Theorem (Pumping Lemma)** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let $L$ be an infinite regular language accepted by a DFA with $m$, states. Then any string $w$ in $L$ with at least $m$ symbols can be decomposed as $w = xyx$ with $|xy| \leq m$, and $|y| \geq 1$ such that | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$w_i = \underbrace{xy...yz}_i$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | is also in $L$ for all $i = 0,1,2...$ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | **We can use the pumping lemma to prove a language is not regular**, but not that it is regular! | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can prove **by contradiction** that $L = \{a^n b^n, n \geq 0 \}$ is not regular using the pumping lemma. | ||