theocs:lecture5-6

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
theocs:lecture5-6 [2024/10/17 13:17] – [Lecture A/6: What is beyond regular languages?] tamitheocs:lecture5-6 [2024/10/17 13:33] (current) – [Pumping lemma] tami
Line 37: Line 37:
  
 Given a language, is there a way to determine whether it is regular? Given a language, is there a way to determine whether it is regular?
 +
 +One possibility for proving the language is not regular is using the **pumping lemma**, which applies for infinite languages (All finite languages are regular!)
  
 <WRAP center round info 60%> <WRAP center round info 60%>
-**Theorem (The pigeon hole principle**+**Theorem (The pigeon hole principle)**
  
 If we put $n$ into $m$ pigeonholes ($n>m$), then at least one pigeon hole must have more than one pigeon! If we put $n$ into $m$ pigeonholes ($n>m$), then at least one pigeon hole must have more than one pigeon!
 </WRAP> </WRAP>
 +
 +<WRAP center round info 60%>
 +**Theorem (Pumping Lemma)**
 +
 +Let $L$ be an infinite regular language accepted by a DFA with $m$, states. Then any string $w$ in $L$ with at least $m$ symbols can be decomposed as $w = xyx$ with $|xy| \leq m$, and $|y| \geq 1$ such that
 +
 +$$w_i = \underbrace{xy...yz}_i$$
 +
 +is also in $L$ for all $i = 0,1,2...$
 +</WRAP>
 +
 +**We can use the pumping lemma to prove a language is not regular**, but not that it is regular!
 +
 +We can prove **by contradiction** that $L = \{a^n b^n, n \geq 0 \}$ is not regular using the pumping lemma.
  
  
  • theocs/lecture5-6.1729171043.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2024/10/17 13:17
  • by tami