Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
theocs:lecture5-6 [2024/10/17 13:13] – [Lecture A/6: What is beyond regular languages?] tami | theocs:lecture5-6 [2024/10/17 13:33] (current) – [Pumping lemma] tami | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
$$A \to \Lambda$$ | $$A \to \Lambda$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Pumping lemma ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP center round important 60%> | ||
+ | $\{a^n b^n | n > 0\}$ Is not finite! it is impossible to create an automaton that can satisfy it! | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The automation would have to remember the number of $a$'s it has seen, which might be arbitrarily large | ||
+ | * **This is impossible for a machine with a finite number of possible states.** Any algorithm will break down when $n$ exceeds the number of states of the machine! | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Given a language, is there a way to determine whether it is regular? | ||
+ | |||
+ | One possibility for proving the language is not regular is using the **pumping lemma**, which applies for infinite languages (All finite languages are regular!) | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP center round info 60%> | ||
+ | **Theorem (The pigeon hole principle)** | ||
+ | |||
+ | If we put $n$ into $m$ pigeonholes ($n>m$), then at least one pigeon hole must have more than one pigeon! | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP center round info 60%> | ||
+ | **Theorem (Pumping Lemma)** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let $L$ be an infinite regular language accepted by a DFA with $m$, states. Then any string $w$ in $L$ with at least $m$ symbols can be decomposed as $w = xyx$ with $|xy| \leq m$, and $|y| \geq 1$ such that | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$w_i = \underbrace{xy...yz}_i$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | is also in $L$ for all $i = 0,1,2...$ | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | **We can use the pumping lemma to prove a language is not regular**, but not that it is regular! | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can prove **by contradiction** that $L = \{a^n b^n, n \geq 0 \}$ is not regular using the pumping lemma. | ||
+ | |||
+ |